The Role of Courts in a Democracy: Alternatives to Judicial Supremacy
Dr Cristina Parau
Parau.pdf (287.33 KB)
The Role of Courts in a Democracy: Alternatives to Judicial Supremacy

This policy brief assesses the adoption of US models of judicial activism in post-Communist countries of central and Eastern Europe, and proposes an alternative model in the form of co-equality as a more effective way to reconcile popular sovereignty with individual liberty.

ALSO OF INTEREST
Policy Brief
Access to Environmental Justice in England and Wales

This policy brief charts the slow boadening of access to environmental justice in England and Wales over the past few decades, and examines current and future prospects with reference to the Aarhus Convention and the implications of potential reforms to the 'loser pays' fees system for legal action taken by environmental NGOs and civil society organizations.

Download
Report
The Courts and Social Policy in the United States

Workshop with the Aspen Institute examining policy issues including affirmative action, reproductive rights, and anti-terror legislation.

Download
Policy Brief
The Capacity of Courts to Handle Complex Cases: Lessons from Technological Risk Regulation

This policy brief provides an overview of technological risk regulation and assesses the role of courts in reviewing the same. In doing so, it shows that the question of the capacity of courts is problematized by at least two different aspects: constitutional and institutional, both of which are malleable and context-specific.

The conclusion discusses the implications of these two features of the capacity of courts for legal and public policy reform.
 
Download
Report
Justice for Apartheid Crimes: Corporations, States, and Human Rights

Report of a symposium exploring issues surrounding post-apartheid justice and redress in South Africa for human rights abuses in which corporations are allegedly implicated.

Download