Private Rights and Public Responsibilities: Recent developments in Scots water law
Sarah Hendry
Hendry.pdf (487.46 KB)
Private Rights and Public Responsibilities: Recent developments in Scots water law
Water law has been the subject of considerable attention in the Scottish Parliament since its re-establishment in 1999, with five Water Acts passed in that time. 
 
This policy brief examines these recent reforms and considers whether there has been a shift from private rights to private responsibilities, or perhaps, from private rights to public rights, over water resources in Scotland.
 
The brief will also consider what lessons may be learned in England from the introduction in Scotland of limited competition in retail services in the business sector, also now part of the current reform package being developed in England. 
 
The policy brief concludes that water has, de facto if not explicitly in the law, moved from the private to the public domain. Holders of land which includes water will still have some special status, but the power to control the resource as a matter of public interest is incontrovertible. 
 
ALSO OF INTEREST
Policy Brief
Rights, Interests, and the Water Resource: Crossing the Rubicon?

 

Download
Policy Brief
The End of Press Freedom

The fourth and final policy brief from our series assessing the progress of the Leveson Inquiry and the future of media regulation sees the Director of the Media Policy Project at the London School of Economics Damian Tambini provocatively argue that we should abandon the concept of press freedom altogether.

 

Download
Policy Brief
Modern Slavery and Migrant Domestic Workers: The Politics of Legal Characterization

This policy brief explains why migrant domestic workers who enter the UK on temporary visas are vulnerable to exploitation by their employers.

 

 

Download
Policy Brief
Leveson Reforms, Editorial Freedom, and Press Discussion of Ordinary Members of the Public

Paul Wragg of the University of Leeds assesses the impact of Lord Justice Leveson’s recommendations for press regulation on ordinary members of the public.

 

With reference to cases such as the treatment of the transgender primary school teacher Lucy Meadows by the Daily Mail, he argues that any future regulator will struggle to achieve any meaningful change to the ‘cultural indifference to individual privacy and dignity’ shown by sections of the press, given Leveson’s failure to clearly define, yet insistence on preserving, press partisanship. 

Download