The ‘Homeless Families with Children’ Litigation
Richard Clary
Clary.pdf (718.77 KB)
The ‘Homeless Families with Children’ Litigation

In the United States, courts have played a key role in defining socio-economic rights and in enforcing the government's obligations to provide and protect those rights.

Such long-term judicial oversight has provoked political debate over the proper role of the courts versus the executive branch. That debate has five key aspects: (1) declaring the right at issue, including the source of that right; (2) defining the scope of the right; (3) enforcing the right; (4) the (alleged) downsides of long-term judicial oversight; and (5) defining when the court should end its role.
 
This policy brief uses the Homeless Families with Children litigation (McCain v. Bloomberg) as a case study. 
 
ALSO OF INTEREST
Report
The Courts and Social Policy in the United States

Workshop with the Aspen Institute examining policy issues including affirmative action, reproductive rights, and anti-terror legislation.

Download
Report
The Capacity of Courts to Handle Complexity

This report and associated policy briefs examine the effectiveness of courts at adjudicating complex cases, through analysis of cases involving health care, education, environmental risk regulation, and commercial law.

Download
Policy Brief
Complexity and the US Civil Jury

Are civil juries today incapable of understanding the complex issues presented to them? Are the results obtained through civil jury trials unfair, ill-informed or tainted? Should the United States move instead toward specialized juries, or trial before specialized judges, in place of the present system? 

Download
Policy Brief
Judging Judges

The principle of independence of the judiciary, while fundamental to a society based on the rule of law, is sometimes used to preclude the evaluation of courts. Such an approach is mistaken: judges and courts should be both independent and subject to evaluation.

Download