The ‘Homeless Families with Children’ Litigation
Richard Clary
Clary.pdf (718.77 KB)
The ‘Homeless Families with Children’ Litigation

In the United States, courts have played a key role in defining socio-economic rights and in enforcing the government's obligations to provide and protect those rights.

Such long-term judicial oversight has provoked political debate over the proper role of the courts versus the executive branch. That debate has five key aspects: (1) declaring the right at issue, including the source of that right; (2) defining the scope of the right; (3) enforcing the right; (4) the (alleged) downsides of long-term judicial oversight; and (5) defining when the court should end its role.
 
This policy brief uses the Homeless Families with Children litigation (McCain v. Bloomberg) as a case study. 
 
ALSO OF INTEREST
Report
The Role of Courts in a Democracy

An analytical report of the workshop and public debate featuring Charles Clarke, Joshua Rozenberg, Lord Justice Jacob and others examines the growing trend towards the ‘judicialization of politics’, in which judges are increasingly implicated in settling policy disputes, especially in the context of constitutional rights.

 

The debate ranges over the new Supreme Court in the UK, and recent controversial decisions over prisoners' voting rights and control orders for terror suspects.

 

Download
Report
Can International Courts Do Justice? Conceptions of Justice in Responding to Conflict

A report of a workshop which explored a range of issues regarding how international criminal tribunals and courts respond to harm caused during violent conflict. 

Download
The Conflict between Government and the Judges

Conflict between the judges and government is built into the very concept of the judicial protection of human rights. The Human Rights Act does presuppose a basic consensus on human rights between the judges, on the one hand, and the government, people and Parliament on the other. However, there is clearly no consensus when it comes to the rights of unpopular minorities, particularly concerning controversial issues such as asylum seekers suspected terrorists.

Download
Policy Brief
Complexity and the US Civil Jury

Are civil juries today incapable of understanding the complex issues presented to them? Are the results obtained through civil jury trials unfair, ill-informed or tainted? Should the United States move instead toward specialized juries, or trial before specialized judges, in place of the present system? 

Download