Skip to main content

Search form

Subscribe to our newsletter

Enter your email address below to receive our free bimonthly newsletter
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon  

 

Main menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Work
    • People
    • Contact us
  • Programmes
    • Courts and Public Policy
      • Courts Programme Synopsis
    • European Civil Justice
      • ECJS Programme Synopsis
    • Regulation, Law & Governance
      • Regulation Programme Synopsis
    • Constitutions
      • Programme Synopsis
    • Contemporary Issues
    • Past
      • Rule of Law in China
        • China Programme Synopsis
      • The Social Contract
        • Programme Synopsis
  • News & Events
    • Events
    • News
      • FLJS e-news
    • Past events
    • Renowned speakers
  • Publications
    • Search publications
    • Courts and Public Policy
    • Constitutions
    • European Civil Justice
    • Regulation
    • China
    • Social Contract
  • Media & Resources
    • For policymakers
      • Europe on the Brink?
      • Russian Socio-Legal Culture
    • For the press
      • Directory of experts
      • FLJS in the press
      • Press Image Gallery
      • Press releases
    • Opinion pieces
      • Leveson and the Royal Charter: an unsatisfactory stalemate
      • Europe on the Brink?
      • Speaking in Many Voices: Egyptians Prepare for a Democratic Era
      • The Cost of a Legal Transition in Egypt: A Price Worth Paying?
      • Black Swans and Elephants on the Move: Can Emergencies Trigger Welfare State Reform?
      • Beyond the Third Way in Labour Law
      • One China, Many Systems
      • The Boumediene Decision: What Now?
    • Podcasts
    • Video
    • RSS feeds from FLJS
Justice and alternative dispute resolution in the EU
If we are to thrive and survive as a society committed to the rule of law, we’ll have to strive to ensure that the Jackson reforms work.

 
Lord Dyson, in his inaugural speech as Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice, October 2012

Programme Synopsis

Featured

A Model for Dispute Resolution in Europe

This policy brief addresses alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in Europe to propose an integrated, holistic approach to encompass the range of mechanisms for resolving disputes, including...

More

The Hidden World of Consumer ADR: Redress and Behaviour

Findings of a Major Comparative Study on Litigation Funding and Costs

This policy brief, written by Dr Christopher Hodges and Professor Stefan Vogenauer of Oxford University, is published as costs and funding are assuming far greater importance as keys to evaluating...

More

Publications

Safeguards in Collective Actions

There is a consensus in Europe that collective action mechanisms need to include correct safeguards in order to prevent abuse.

Consumer-to-Business ADR Structures

This policy brief addresses the difficulty consumers face when trying to resolve minor disputes with business, for which the courts prove too...

The Hidden World of Consumer ADR: Redress and Behaviour

This report summarizes the findings of an Oxford research project and an international conference which assessed alternative methods for settling...

Pages

  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »

FLJS Programmes

  • Courts and Public Policy
  • European Civil Justice
  • Regulation, Law & Governance
  • Constitutions
  • Contemporary Issues
  • Past

Associated with

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

Wolfson College

Linton Road
Oxford
OX2 6UD
United Kingdom
Phone: +44 (0)1865 284433

Follow @LawJusticeSoc

 

       RSS RSS

 

Company registration: 5371054 (Registered in England and Wales)
Registered office: 50 Broadway, London SW1H 0BL Charity registration number: 1111842

Copyright 2012 FLJS, Wolfson College, University of Oxford  Website by Olamalu